REVERSE THE CURSE: MAXIMIZING THE POTENTIAL OF RESOURCE-DRIVEN ECONOMIES
McKINSEY GLOBAL INSTITUTE (Richard
DOBBS, Jeremy OPPENHEIM, Adam KENDALL, Fraser THOMPSON, Martin BRATT and
Fransje van der MAREL)
Rising resource prices and expanded production have raised the number of countries where the resource sector represents a major share of the economy, from 58 in 1995 to 81 in 2011. That number will rise: to meet soaring demand for resources and replace rapidly depleting supply, the world should invest a total of up to $17 trillion in oil and gas and in minerals by 2030, double the historical rate. In 20 years, almost half of the world’s countries could depend on their resource endowments for growth.
Economies
with natural-resource endowments have a huge opportunity to transform their
prospects. But history suggests that they could all too easily squander the
windfall.
To
date, resource-driven countries have tended to underperform those without
significant resources: almost 80 percent of the former have a per-capita income
below the global average. Since 1995, more than half of these countries have
failed to match the average growth rate of all countries. Only one-third have
maintained growth beyond the resource boom. Recent McKinsey research lays out a
new model that could help countries capture the coming resource windfall.
To
be included in our roster of resource-driven countries in oil and gas and in
minerals, countries had to meet at least one of three criteria: (1) resource
exports accounted for 20 percent or more of total exports in 2011; (2)
resources on average accounted for more than 20 percent of government revenue
from 2006 to 2010; and (3) resource rents were more than 10 percent of GDP in
2010 or the most recent year for which data are available. Also included are
countries likely to meet these criteria in the near future.
Resource-driven
countries in the low- and lower-middle-income brackets could capture $1.2
trillion to $3 trillion of the $11 trillion to $17 trillion cumulative global
investment in resources to 2030. At the high end of this range, these countries
would net almost $170 billion a year, more than three times their
development-aid flows in 2011. There is some potential to lift almost half of
the world’s poor out of poverty. That would be more than the number of people
who left the ranks of the poor as a result of China’s rapid economic
development over the past 20 years.
To
capture that investment, these economies should reframe their economic
strategies around three key imperatives: effectively developing their resource
sector, capturing value from it, and transforming that value into long-term
prosperity. The research explores best practices on six fronts: building the
resource sector’s institutions and governance, developing infrastructure,
ensuring robust fiscal policy and competitiveness, supporting local content,
deciding how to spend resource windfalls wisely, and transforming resource
wealth into broader economic development (exhibit).
Exhibit
The McKinsey Global Institute has identified countries performing well
across the six areas of the resource value chain.
1.
The resource sector’s institutions and governance
No
single model of state involvement in the sector works best—that depends on the
context. Whichever model a country chooses, three guiding principles are vital:
a stable regulatory regime with clear rules, the exposure of national operators
to competition from private-sector firms, and major efforts to attract and
retain world-class talent.
2.
Infrastructure
Resource-driven
countries will together require more than $1.3 trillion of annual total
infrastructure investment over the next 17 years—almost four times the
1995–2012 level—to sustain projected economy-wide growth. Given the huge need,
these countries should look closely at ways of sharing the cost of resource
infrastructure. We estimate that different operators could share nearly 70
percent of the investment in it, industry and other users the remaining 30
percent. Governments need to plan early, rigorously assess the costs and
benefits of sharing, and pick the right model to implement it.
3.
Competitiveness and fiscal policy
Countries
have much to gain from doing all they can to ensure that their resource sectors
are as globally competitive as possible. Instead of focusing narrowly on fiscal
policy, governments should take a broader view, including production costs,
country risk, and their countries’ share of the revenue pie. Resource-driven
countries could boost the competitiveness of their resource sectors by more
than 50 percent.
4.
Local-content development
Between
40 and 80 percent of the revenue created in oil and gas and in mining pays for
goods and services—exceeding, in some cases, tax and royalty payments. More
than 90 percent of resource-driven countries regulate the proportion of goods
and services supplied locally, but much local-content regulation is badly
designed. Governments need to ensure that it doesn’t compromise
competitiveness.
5.
Spending the windfall
History
is littered with examples of governments squandering their resource revenues
through corruption or simple mismanagement. To avoid such waste, governments
should ensure that the spending and benefits are transparent and keep
themselves lean.
6.
Economic development
To
overcome the underperformance of the past, governments should remove barriers
to productivity across their economies. Even in the past, tension colored the
relationship between extractive companies and host governments. As resource
production shifts to developing and frontier economies—often with weak
infrastructures and unstable political systems—it becomes more and more vital
that they adopt a new approach. Operating risks have increased ninefold.
Essentially,
these companies ought to shift from a pure extraction mind-set to a
developmental one. They must build a deep understanding of their host countries
and rigorously assess their own contribution to broader economic development.
Last, they must ensure that their efforts match the priorities of host
governments and that any package of initiatives is part of a relationship with
them—a relationship that will endure for any project’s lifetime, which can
stretch for decades.
About
the authors
Richard Dobbs is a director of the McKinsey Global Institute, where Fraser Thompson is a
senior fellow; Jeremy
Oppenheim is a director in McKinsey’s London office, where Martin Bratt is an
associate principal; and Adam
Kendall is a principal in the Johannesburg office, where Fransje van der Marel is
a consultant.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.